Quiz 1 Review
    Arch 324/524, Introduction to Structural Design, University of Virginia
    Copyright © 1996-2000 Kirk Martini. Last Modified Tue Mar 7, 12:00 PM
       Table of
    Contents

    Distribution

    100     
    100     
    99     
    98     
    97     
    97     
    97     89     
    97     89     
    97     89     
    97     89     
    96     88     79
    95     88     79               
    95     88     78               
    95     88     78               
    94     87     78               
    94     87     77               
    93     86     77               
    93     85     77     69          
    93     85     76     68          
    93     85     75     68          
    92     84     75     68            49     
    92     83     74     66            48     
    91     82     73     65     57     48     
    91     81     73     64     57     42     
    91     80     72     64     57     41     
    91     80     72     63     55     41     
    90     80     70     63     50     40     28     17
    
    

    Mean: 77.8, Median 81


    Problem 1

    A correct answer.

    On part c), many people arrived at the correct answer using incorrect reasoning. The key point is that moving the support recudes the vertical reactions, which in turn reduces the moment. The incorrect soolution below bases it correct conclusion on the incorrect assumption that the vertical reaction remains 15 K.


    Problem 2


    Problem 3

    Many people missed part d) which requires recognizing that the material has passed the yield point. A few people recognized that the material was inelastic, but concluded that the problem was unsolvable. The following is a clear and correct solution.


    Problem 4

    The potential stumbling block on this problem is that the point where the cable meets the structure is not dimensioned. The key to solution is to realize that the point lies somewhere along the line of the cable; the particular location on that line doesn't affect the reactions.

    The following is a simple ans straightforward solution.

    The following is a solution that converts the structure similar to one done in lab.

    A similiar solution assumes the point of connection, and then goes on to solve.

    Yet another approach to this problem...


    Problem 5

    a) Many people missed the upper portion of the tributary area, a width of 20 feet rather than 30 feet.


    b) The following answer addresses the issue of connections, which is a good answer. Several people also discussed the issue of putting too much steel reinforcement in a reinforced concrete beam, which got full credit if it was explained well.

    And another (less successful) approach...


    c)

    Arch 324/524, Introduction to Structural Design, University of Virginia
    Copyright © 1996-2000 Kirk Martini. Last Modified Tue Mar 7, 12:00 PM
      Table of
    Contents