|
|
|
CASE STUDY
Building Description
The
Rotunda, Exterior Lawn Side
The Rotunda (1826) at the Academical Village of the University of Virginia
was designed by Thomas Jefferson to be the centerpiece of his celebrated
campus plan. It was the library, the most important building at the university,
the repository of knowledge. As such, it occupied the central location
between the two long arcades composed of faculty pavilions and student
rooms. Jefferson modeled his Rotunda after the Pantheon in Rome reducing
its scale by one half. Unlike the Pantheon, it has two intermediate floors
composed of oval rooms with the dome room at the top surrounded by niches
for books. The 72 foot diameter of the space encloses approximately 4070
square feet. |
|
Dome
Room Interior, c. mid 19th Century
As the university grew so did the book collection resulting in an addition
on the north side designed by Robert Mills in 1850. It burned in 1895,
and Stanford White remodeled the Rotunda by taking out the intermediate
floors to make it truer to its Pantheon precedent. For the United States
bicentennial in 1976, the Rotunda was remodeled again with the intention
of returning it to the original Jefferson scheme in its spatial configuration.
However, mechanical systems and artificial lighting were discretely added.
The building now accommodates a variety of uses; lectures, meetings, symposia,
dinners and tours |
Oculus
in Rotunda Dome
Daylight is admitted to the Rotunda dome room through a central overhead
oculus and 14 double hung windows around the
perimeter. The conical skylight, 16 feet in diameter, admits daylight uniformly
from all directions of the sky dome. The 7 foot by 4 foot clear glazed
windows (85% transmission) create a perimeter zone of daylight under the
circular gallery. However, the daylighting conditions in this perimeter
zone are not uniform due to porticos at the north and south sides which
shade the windows, fireplaces in lieu of windows on the east and west sides
and trees of varied size and spacing which obstruct the daylight. The windows
are placed on 18 degree radii and set within deep splayed recesses 0f 68%
reflectance. The dome lined, with white metal acoustical panels, has a
reflectance of 62% and the heart pine floor has a reflectance of 28%. |
Measurements
Rotunda Plan with Readings Grid
Footcandle readings were taken at 9:00am, noon and 3:00pm under both
cloudy and sunny skies. Readings were taken at waist level on a radial
grid as shown on the plans. Although the daylighting from the overcast,
cloudy sky appeared visually to be unchanging, the illuminance meter indicated
significant changing conditions throughout the time readings were taken
The absolute amount of change was not great but at low light levels it
was a factor of two or three.
The illuminance values in the dome room under a cloudy sky were quite
uniform along circumferential points. There was a uniform gradient of 1:2
from the perimeter to the center. The levels in the reading areas under
the gallery were quite variable.
|
|
Rotunda
Section
The absolute illuminance values in the dome room increased under a sunny
sky but without reaching excessive levels. The approximately 1:2 gradient
from perimeter to center along the radials still pertained. Values around
the perimeter were always higher in one location due to the sun's position
in the sky at different times of the day. The direct sun only reaches the
dome room floor when it is above 56 degrees in the sky, the angle between
the oculus edge and the column base. In Charlottesville, this only occurs
at any time during the day from April 1 to September 12. For most of the
year, therefore, there is no "hot spot" sun problem. |
Analysis
The design of the dome room is simple in concept but sophisticated in
its realization creating a uniform daylighting environment. The oculus
is balanced in terms of glare by the smooth curved vault leading up to
it. All available light that enters the space bounces off of this ceiling
and back toward the center thus distributing the light throughout The reading
alcoves under the gallery provide enough room for a study desk at the window
between the book shelves. The white wood trim and books reflect the light
and diffuse it to reduce glare conditions. The deep window splays of white
wood help to reduce the brightness contrast with the glazing to a comfortable
visual level.
Subjective impressions were recorded at the beginning and end of the
day.
Under a cloudy sky they were as follows:
 |
| pleasant |
 |
unpleasant |
| light |
 |
dark |
| cheerful |
 |
gloomy |
| uniform |
 |
varied |
| comfortable |
 |
uncomfortable |
|
Subjective impressions under a sunny sky were as follows:
 |
| pleasant |
 |
unpleasant |
| light |
 |
dark |
| cheerful |
 |
gloomy |
| uniform |
 |
varied |
| comfortable |
 |
uncomfortable |
|
The daylighting in the dome room of the Rotunda is a triumph of quality
over quantity. In the central space, the illuminance values are within
comfortable range for reading under sunny skies, but somewhat low for this
purpose under cloudy skies. The perimeter zone is more problematic due
to the large trees which were not there during Jefferson's time. There
are no glare problems due to brightness contrasts except for the hot spot
of the sun shining on the dome wall. However, it is the diffuse distribution
of daylight that makes the strongest visual impression. Daylight suffuses
the space under all sky conditions by lighting the great domed surface
thus beautifully rendering the space. This effect allows visitors and users
to appreciate the dome room as a single cohesive space which achieves the
designer's intention of creating a symbolic yet functional centerpiece
for the University of Virginia.
[Back]
[Up] [Next]
|